If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 17:30 on June 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in front of the office of “D” located in Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, Seowon-si; (b) reported that the Defendant d’s sound was under the influence of alcohol; and (c) the victim E (Nam, 31) who works for daily work through the above office, as the Defendant, stated that “the Defendant was released from her frith; (d) frith, the Defendant entered the house; and (e) frith, a dangerous object located in the Defendant’s house (15 cm length, 30 cm in total length), and threatened the victim by taking off the frith (15 cm length, and 30 cm in total length) as the part of the Defendant’s ship, and by threatening the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of excessive photographic statutes;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. As agreed with the victim in sentencing, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.

Although the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the same criminal act and was sentenced to a punishment for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapon, etc.), the relationship between the defendant and the victim, the background leading to the crime, the excessive risk of the defendant's use (the immediately preceding the criminal act was that the defendant left his/her arms and left his/her arms, but he/she would not be deprived of his/her damage), and the crime prior to the repeated crime was committed on August 16, 201. The crime prior to the repeated crime was committed on August 16, 201. The recent decision of unconstitutionality was made on the legal provisions related to the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and other factors such as the defendant's age, character, environment, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.,

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.