손해배상(자)
1. The defendant shall pay 7,440,760 won to the plaintiff A, 300,000 won to the plaintiff B, and 200,000 won to the plaintiff C, respectively.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition (1) The Defendant is a mutual aid operator who entered into a vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the Ddong Tourist Buses owned by Newdong Tourism Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant buses”).
(2) On November 16, 2014, when driving the instant bus on or around 16:25, 2014, at the same time, at a speed of about 40 km in the speed of the speed of 50 km from the boundary of the sports complex to the scambrode of the 40km at the erode of the ero-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong. Thus, the Plaintiff’s failure to proceed safely in accordance with the new signals and to make a left turn to the left-hand turn from the 4th apartment of the ero-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). (3) On the other hand, Plaintiff C, the wife of Plaintiff B and his child, is located.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, and 4 evidence Gap 9-11, and 14 (= Evidence Nos. 3-2, 3, and 6) The purport of the whole pleadings
B. (1) According to the above facts, the defendant, who is a mutual aid business entity of the bus of this case, is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.
(2) As to this, the Defendant asserts to the effect that “the Plaintiff A was at the time of the instant accident, at the time of the instant accident, negligent in entering the intersection in spite of the duty of care to enter the intersection after sufficiently examining whether the Plaintiff A did not immediately enter the intersection, and whether there was a vehicle already going through the intersection, and then neglecting the duty of care to enter the intersection, thereby making the signal changed, and thus, the Plaintiff A’s error should also be taken into account in calculating the amount of damages.”