except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Power] On January 24, 2008, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act by the Seoul Northern District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

Around 00:30 on February 12, 2020, the Defendant driven a F-to-purd vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.175% under the influence of alcohol at approximately 200 meters from the road near C located in Sinpo City B to the front road in D.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement, investigation report, and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of the same type of suspect records);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Act on Suspension of Execution: Social danger of drunk driving and the purport of the revision of the Road Traffic Act to which statutory penalty is raised, the mere fact that there is a need to strictize the act of drunk driving in light of the above-mentioned circumstances: it is against the recognition of mistake and reflects the fact that there is no criminal history other than the punishment of a fine once due to drunk driving, and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments including the degree of taking-off, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime are considered;