When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 20, 2016, the Defendant driven, at around 03:17, a D cafeteria located in Ulsan-si, Northern-si, Ulsan-si, a vehicle with approximately 20 meters-meter road from the front of the D cafeteria to the nearby road, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.175 percent in blood.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Inquiries about the results of regulating driving of drinking, reporting on the circumstances of driving of drinking, and statement on the circumstances of driving of drinking;

1. On-site photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel stated that the defendant's statement at the time of driving alcohol is "to be deemed to have driven at the time of driving alcohol" is sufficient to have credibility of the consistent statement (the statement to the effect that the defendant was waiting for driving a vehicle) of police officers dispatched to the site at the time when he believed the horses of the police officer in mobilization, waiting for a proxy officer at the time when he stated, and did not have a driving. However, the police officers dispatched to the site at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the time at the

The workplace has also been fluent and too difficult, so it has been fluent.

It is too true that it is a crime

In light of the fact that the Defendant written in his own pen, the above argument by the Defendant and the defense counsel cannot be accepted (the report on the hearing of the police statement by H, consistent with the Defendant’s above defense counsel, cannot be trusted in light of the relationship with the Defendant, etc.).

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;