beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.06.21 2013고정871

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the violation of the Road Traffic Act are those who are engaged in driving of Bbea cruise-car vehicles;

On November 21, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car on November 21, 2012, and proceeded ahead of the New Airport Expressway, which is located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, at a speed of seven-lanes from Seoul to the airport protection area to the eight-lane speed.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to ensure safety distance that can be avoided when a vehicle stops in front of the vehicle, while driving the vehicle behind the vehicle at new airportTol, and thus, in such a case, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to secure and proceed with safety distance that can be avoided when the vehicle stops in front of the vehicle.

그럼에도 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 그대로 진행한 과실로 때마침 같은 방향으로 앞서가다 요금계산을 하기 위해 일시 정차하고 있던 피해자 C(27세)이 운행하는 D 포르테쿱 승용차의 뒷범퍼 부분을 피고인이 운전한 위 승용차의 앞 범퍼 부분으로 들이 받았다.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused injury to the victim C, such as brain salvin in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, injury to the victim E (the 26-year-old) who was on board the said damaged vehicle, such as salvinal salinitis that requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and injury to the victim F (the 27-year-old) who was on board the said damaged vehicle, such as salinal salinum salinum that requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and damaged the damaged vehicle C in excess of KRW 473,568 in total.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a Bbea cruise car.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which has not been covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the defendant has the same date and time as the above 1.1.