2. The instant crime was committed by the Defendant, which was not classified from January 27, 2014 to March 12, 2014, set up 34 game machine “Sater Jy” and offered the same to those who want to find the game site, and exchanged the score obtained from the game. As such, there are favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s recognition of all of the instant crimes and reflection thereof.

However, in light of the seriousness of the social harm and harm of the crime related to illegal game room business, such as this case, it is deemed that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable even considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and environment, the means and consequence of the crime, it is difficult to view that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, even if it is considered unfair.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.