피고인은 2018. 6. 2. 23:15 경 여수시 B에 있는 ‘C ’에서, 피고인이 술을 마시고 돈을 내지 않는다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 여수경찰서 D 지구대 소속 순경 E이 피고인의 지갑에 돈이 있는 것을 확인하고 술값을 지불 하라고 말하자 “ 야, 쬐끔 한 놈 아, 내가 삼촌뻘인데 니가 뭔 데 돈을 내라 하냐,

In this case, with a sound, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of report 112 by making once the left side of the above E at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and F;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, the fact that there are many criminal records of the reason for sentencing of punishment of imprisonment with prison labor, interference with the performance of official duties in an excessive manner beyond the passive resistance against the performance of official duties, and on the other hand, the defendant reflects his gender, taking comprehensive account of the defendant's age, sex, sex, family relationship, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, and circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, and determine punishment as ordered.