However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 5. 10. 08:15경 부산 부산진구 B 소재 ‘C’에서 술을 마시던 중 일행으로부터 피해자 D(여, 22세)이 피고인을 험담했다는 이야기를 듣고 부산 부산진구 E, 2층에 있는 ‘F’ 주점으로 간 다음 그곳에서 술을 마시던 피해자에게 “왜 니가 꼬셨느니 마니 뒤에서 이야기를 했느냐”라고 항의하면서 서로 말다툼을 하던 중 테이블 위에 놓여있던 위험한 물건인 유리 맥주잔을 피해자의 얼굴을 향해 던져 입술 부위에 맞게 하였다.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things and carried them with the victim who was unable to know the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to standing photographs and photographs;

1. Article 258-2 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1448, Apr. 2, 201);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the extenuating circumstances);

1. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria: Reduction area and imprisonment with labor for six months to one year;

2. Determination of sentence: Six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence;