Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Defendant

A is the driver of the city bus B.

No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. shall cause any danger and injury to traffic by repeatedly or continuously violating road traffic regulations without justifiable grounds.

Nevertheless, on January 9, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 15:49, and changed from three lanes to two lanes in the building line in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City to the left, and proceeded to the left, and obstructed the passage of the vehicle at C in the two-lanes, and the Espon vehicle operated by D, and the vehicle signal at the front of G in Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, at around 15:53 on the same day, was in violation of the signal signal by disregarding and driving it, while the signal is a pedestrian signal.

As a result, the defendant was driving a dysculous which causes danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Blue scambling images and caps photographs;

1. Blus video CD (the defendant asserts that the driver of the city bus who is a public transportation) is a legitimate act. However, the contents of the crime in this case are three-lanes, and the defendant has made a left turn to the left, and the pedestrian signal is proceeding against the signals, and it cannot be deemed that the above act is permitted. The defendant's argument is not acceptable.). The defendant's argument is not applicable to the law.

1. Relevant Articles 151-2 and 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines concerning criminal facts, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;