명예훼손
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On December 18, 2017, in the Seo-gu Seoul Apartment Management Office around 10:20 on December 18, 2017, the Defendant: “The victim D, the representative of the occupants of the above apartment building, and the staff members E, etc. of the Hain or the management office, among the victims E, are located, the 10% of the width and 7 million won.” The Defendant stated that the Defendant does not go to our territory because it is within 10% of the width.
India shall pay wages, and at the level of 7 million Won, we shall see to us whether you remain.
Does this balance have been known as having changed in money. Does this balance.
Does such sarson’s Chairman
“The victim’s reputation was damaged by publicly alleging the fact that the authenticity was not verified.”
2. Determination
(a) Punishment Acts: Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act;
나. 반의사 불 벌뵈 : 형법 제 312조 제 2 항
(c) Revocation of complaint after public prosecution: Withdrawal of complaint received on April 17, 2018;
(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;