beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.08 2016고정127

도로교통법위반(공동위험행위)

Text

Defendant

A, B, C, E, F, and G shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of 2,50,000 won.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 15, 2015, from around 01:00 to around 04:00 on the same day, the Defendants came to contact with “I” of the Smartphone Track Kakao Stoo, which was opened by H, and discovered that the names influords driven 100 vehicles and the Mactobs, leading to the Macju in Daegu-gu, such as the two-lane parks and the Rackle-distance, leading to the Macju. After finding that they moved to the Macju procession in the Macju procession in Daegu-si, the Defendants moved from the front of the Macdong located in the Macdong located in the Mac-si, Busan-do, around 03:50 on August 15, 2015 to move from the Macsan-dong to the 2nd Macksan-do, the front and the Macton in front of the Macton to the 2nd 2nd.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A, B, C, D, F, and G;

1. Partial statement of Defendant E

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer in relation to the defendant A, B, C, D, F, and G;

1. Some statements concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the police against Defendant E;

1. Investigation report (related to suspect's vehicle AVNI search details);

1. A report on investigation (attaching photographs of the suspect's operating page);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (with regard to specified driving distance in common);

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Articles 150 subparag. 1 and 46(1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act