When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around August 2013, the Defendant leased a three-wheeled flag from the victim E, a holder of a three-wheeled flag (water spraying equipment installed at the entrance to prevent fugitives from entering a large-type construction site) in the vicinity of the D Housing Site Development Project, which is implemented by the Defendant, Daegu-si, Daegu-si, and the end of which, in fact, the Defendant loaned the three-wheeled flag from the victim E, who owns the three-wheeled flag (such equipment as installed at the entrance to prevent fugitive dusts from entering a large-type construction site). Even if the Defendant borrowed it from the victim and used it for the benefit of the Defendant, the Defendant was merely lent the name of the Defendant for entry into the above housing site development project, and was not paid due to the operator of F Co., Ltd. and H’s failure to pay the price, which is the normal payment of the three-wheeled flag. Accordingly, the Defendant acquired the amount equivalent to 1650,000 won for three

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigative reports (Attachment of relevant public inspection documents), investigation reports (Submission of materials by complainants), investigation reports (Submission of reference materials by complainants - F materials for civil procedure), investigation reports (in relation to this case - in favor of complainants);

1. Recording and recording recording, -G telephone conversation investigation content Defendant and defense counsel asserted that the Defendant had the intent and ability to repay to the Defendant at the time of the lease of the instant three-wheeled wheels, and therefore there was no intention to acquire by deception, and therefore, according to records, the victim claims rent to the Defendant, and the Defendant avoided payment by asserting that the Defendant had the responsibility to pay rent to the Defendant, and the Defendant brought a civil lawsuit against F, the victim reversed the victim’s statement, such as preparing a confirmation document that the Defendant had the responsibility to pay to the F, and preparing it at the same time, making the statement to F, thereby reconcing the victim’s fee recovery.