2. Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final;

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a driver's vehicle with Cgallon.

On January 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on the 12:50 on January 16, 2016, and led to driving the road in front of the warehouse of the Young-gu Agricultural Cooperative in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, to the direction of the wind from the direction of Kimcheon-si.

At all times, there was a duty of care to ensure the safe operation of the vehicle by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes for the person engaged in driving the vehicle with the central line installed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the front right part of the vehicle in front of the gallon in the front part of the vehicle operated by the victim D (51 tax) that was going to the opposite vehicle due to the negligence of breaking the center line.

As a result, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim D, such as light finites, which requires approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim F (V, 46 years of age), such as mination of finites on the right side, which requires about 10 weeks of medical treatment, and the victim G (V, 25 years of age) who was accompanied by the above coinck also sustained injury, such as light finites, which requires about 2 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, on-site photographs, a survey report on actual condition, a medical certificate, data from weather observations, and a detailed inquiry;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is likely to be subject to criticism in light of the background of the accident, the degree of the Defendant’s breach of duty of care, and the degree

This is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant.

However, the defendant.