On October 29, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Drivers, Violence, etc.) in the Busan District Court's subsidiary branch on October 29, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the military prison on April 24

At around 02:40 on May 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sought 112 reports from the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si B, Seocheon-gu, 2014, and found the Defendant, who was dispatched to the site, was off and seated up from the waste; (b) discovered the Defendant, and recommended him to return home while entering the Defendant’s seat, and thereby interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of the police officer regarding the report on the performance of duties by assaulting the police officer, such as satising D’s satisf, and flabing D’s satisf, and flabing D’s sat retail, flafing D’s sat retail, and tearing D’s satisfing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Photographs of damaged parts;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiry reports and investigation reports and investigation reports Acts and subordinate statutes, including criminal records;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant, for the reason of sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders, has a very high record of being punished for the same or similar crimes, and the criminal committed during the period of repeated crime for which one month has passed since the release was made, it is inevitable to sentence the defendant to

However, the sentencing factors specified in the trial process of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, previous conviction, etc., including the fact that the defendant has led to a crime, has committed contingent crimes, appears to require medical treatment for alcohol addiction, etc., and the degree of violence is not very serious, shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the sentencing factors specified in the trial process of this case.