beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.10.24 2018고정944

청소년보호법위반

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant called “D” on the revised Gu of Sungnam-si C and the first floor of Sungnam-si.

No person shall sell, lend, distribute, or provide free of charge drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, at around 17:30 on July 26, 2018, the Defendant sold to juveniles E (n .e., 17 s) and F (n.e., 17 s) to customers, such as the first day of a drug harmful to juveniles, the Defendant sold to E (n.e., 17 s.) and E (n. 17 s.e., 8,00 s.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of G and F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Subparagraph 6 of Article 59 of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Crimes and Article 28 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Crimes, and the selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. When the sentencing of Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1448, Apr. 1, 2009) is deemed to be in place at the time of the occurrence of cremation, taking into account the following circumstances into account: (a) the circumstances leading up to the instant crime; (b) the confession and reflection of the Defendant; and (c) the circumstances leading to the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, living environment