When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

In September 2014, the Defendant started to open and publicize NAV bags, while operating the Internet clothing shopping mall of B.

No one shall deliver, sell, forge, imitate, or possess a trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark for the purpose of using or making another person use such trademark on goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

Nevertheless, around February 2015, the Defendant purchased a fake “dibin white” in the Seoul East-gu Seoul East-gu market, followed by affixing it in a camera on March 9, 2015, and then posted it in the Kamerg on the Kamerg.

Accordingly, the Defendant infringed on the trademark right of Memers, which was registered as a trademark in the Korean Intellectual Property Office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Entry in a report prepared by the police on internal investigation (a notice on a notice to sell marbin in the NAbrob Blouse Blouse Blouse Blouse within the four pages);

1. Application of the statute stated in "the reply to a request for appraisal, such as whether trademark infringement has been infringed," prepared by the Round of the Bank of Korea.

1. Relevant legal provisions and Article 93 of the Trademark Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;