2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

A. On July 5, 2006, the Plaintiff leased a residential building (No. 106Da1002, 106, 1002) with the period from July 5, 2006 to July 4, 2008, with the lease deposit amounting to KRW 170 million from Defendant B.

B. Defendant C participated in the above lease as a partner of Defendant B, and agreed on July 5, 2006 that at the time of concluding the lease agreement, Defendant C would jointly and severally perform the obligation to return the lease deposit to the Plaintiff with Defendant B.

C. The Plaintiff paid the full amount of the lease deposit to the Defendants at the time of the conclusion of the above lease agreement.

The plaintiff notified the defendants of his intention to terminate the lease before the expiration of the above lease term and requested the return of the lease deposit, but the defendants did not refund the lease deposit for economic reasons.

[Grounds for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1-3 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the above lease contract has expired, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the plaintiff 170 million won the lease deposit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is accepted in its entirety and it is so decided as per Disposition.