beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.08.14 2017가단4300

대여금

Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 79,50,000 and KRW 78,500 among them, from December 9, 2017 to the day of full payment.

Reasons

1. The assertion and judgment

A. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 (including each number, if any) of the remittance facts, the plaintiff transferred money at the request of the defendant as set forth below.

The plaintiff asserts that each of the above money was a loan to the defendant and sought payment of the unpaid principal of the loan and damages for delay. The above, we examine whether each of the sequences set forth below (hereinafter referred to as "the first loan") is a loan by the same method as "the first loan"), and whether the unpaid amount is much.

[ table] The remittance amount from the date of remittance (unit: original) was transferred KRW 3 million on September 16, 2015, in the name of the payee’s account, and KRW 2 million on December 12, 2015, and December 28, 2015, in December 12, 2015. < Amended by Act No. 13578, Dec. 12, 2015; Act No. 13578, Dec. 12, 2015; Act No. 13588, Dec. 28, 2015.

C C From December 18, 2015 to September 21, 2016, Defendant 4,700,000 (Defendant 4, 20,000 March 30, 2016) is the Defendant’s children.

5) Defendant 6, 20,000, May 10, 2016, Defendant 20,000, Defendant 20,000 on June 27, 2016, 200,000 E7 October 5, 2016, Defendant 8,000,00 on October 13, 2016, is F Defendant’s husband and wife.

9. 10,00,000 F 10,00 on November 29, 2016, 2010 on January 25, 2017, 2017, G 10,000 H 10,000 on February 6, 2017: (a)0,000,000 on February 10, 200 on February 6, 2017, 13, 200 I 13, 200 on February 6, 2017: 20,000,000 G 14 on February 6, 2017; (b) 10,000 on March 17, 200, 15,000 on March 5, 100,000, 100 on April 10, 2017;

B. As to KRW 1,00,000, the Defendant claimed that the Plaintiff lent KRW 3,00,000 to M with the Defendant’s introduction. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 3,00,00 to the Defendant’s account, and the Defendant’s payment of interest KRW 60,000 per month to the Plaintiff on 11 occasions does not conflict between the parties. According to the above facts of recognition, it is reasonable to deem that the Plaintiff lent KRW 2,00,00 to the Defendant at KRW 2,00 per month. 2) As to KRW 2,00,000 to the Defendant’s introduction, the Defendant lent KRW 5,00,00 to C, and C.