2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The defendant.

A. On October 24, 2013, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract by the Defendant for the construction cost of 303,600,000, and the completion date of the new urban-type housing construction project of Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as of January 20, 2014.

B. The Plaintiff left the construction site at the time of completion, and the remainder of the construction was approved by Nonparty D to complete and complete the construction.

C. On November 14, 2014, the Plaintiff received 268,800,000 of the construction price from the Defendant.

On December 2, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a “statement for the change of the cost of construction,” and added electric and gas facility construction works. The Plaintiff agreed to pay KRW 40,000,000 by March 3, 2015 when the Plaintiff completed the said additional construction and defect repair works.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant Additional Construction Agreement”). / [Grounds for recognition] Evidence A 1 to 3, witness D’s testimony, purpose of the entire pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment asserted that the Plaintiff should receive KRW 40,00,000 from the Defendant on the grounds that the Plaintiff completed the additional construction work and the repair of defects in accordance with the instant additional construction work agreement.

However, it is difficult to find out that the Plaintiff completed the additional construction work and the repair of defects in accordance with the instant additional construction work agreement, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s argument.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.