If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

In collusion with B, C, D, F, and G, the Defendant is not a former tenant of 103 Dongdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I apartment house owned by the wife B, and despite the fact that the Defendant is not a former tenant of 103 Dong-dong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City. However, F recruited the Defendant, and B recruited the Defendant, and G created a certificate of employment as if the Defendant was a J employee, and the Defendant and B, D, and C made a false lease contract as if the Defendant were the lessee of this case under the above 103. The Defendant applied for a loan of the former loan by submitting the aforementioned false lease contract, certificate of employment, etc. to the branch office of the new bank located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, Seoul, on June 2, 2012, and the victim’s employee was defrauded of KRW 30 million from the former employee of the bank as the loan of the victim. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23720, Jun. 8, 2012>

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to the defendant, B, C, D, F, and G;

1. Application of a copy of the agreement on loan transactions with a new bank A to the recipient;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment.