무고
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) The prosecutor of the court below confirmed that the defendant comprehensively delegated the management of the office of this case to D in light of the fact that the defendant used the building's construction cost of the building entrusted to D due to the rent received from D, and that the defendant individually delegated the management of the office of this case to D in light of the fact that the defendant used the building's construction cost of the building entrusted to D at the time. (c) On the other hand, the defendant prepared a new lease contract with D after release to D to obtain lease contract and confirmed it as the defendant's agent, and as at the time, D used the building's lease contract to D without any authority, and thus, it erred in the judgment of the court below to the effect that the defendant's lease the office of this case to D without any authority.
2. Determination
A. A. Around November 20, 2012, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case submitted a false complaint stating that “D shall, without authority, enter the name and resident registration number of the instant office in the lease contract to be exercised while leasing the instant office to E without authority, and deliver the lease contract to E, which would be punished.”
Accordingly, the defendant is D.