However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On May 20, 2017, on May 20, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle with C, under the influence of alcohol of about 15k alcohol content at the section of about 0.176%, from the front of the apartment complex of the upper 3-dong located in the 64-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, 09:15 on May 20, 2017, to the road front of the 7.4km coastwise west-gun, Seo-ri, Uan-gun, U.S., the southan-do Office of the Republic of Korea.

나. 2017. 5. 27. 경 범행 피고인은 2017. 5. 27. 01:15 경 목포시 남 농로 102에 있는 문화예술회관 앞 도로에서부터 같은 시 섶 나루 길 126에 있는 CU 메디 타워 점 앞 도로에 이르기까지 약 3km 의 구간에서 혈 중 알콜 농도 0.211% 의 술에 취한 상태로 C 싼 타 페 승용차를 운전하였다.

2. On May 30, 2017, the Defendant was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 390,000 in total from the injured party, as if he/she had no intent or ability to pay the price to the victim’s account in the “F” of the “F” of the “F” of the victim’s operation at F, supra, on May 30, 2017, as if he/she did not have an intent or ability to pay the price to the account of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. Around 02:00 on May 31, 2017, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) the Defendant, at the entertainment drinking point in the “F” trade name; (b) the Defendant, who once drinking again to the victim E ( South and the age of 28; and (c) the Defendant, at the same time, the Defendant, who suffered from the loss,

Viewing with the purport of the phrase “,” the victim expressed the following: (a) the victim expressed the horses to the effect that “the victim she would take alcohol, she must do so,” and (b) the victim expressed the victim with a large voice at the entrance of the above entertainment station to the effect that “the frien gue, frien gue,” and (c) the victim expressed the said entertainment center for about 30 minutes, such as avoiding the disturbance.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's operation of entertainment centers by force.

4. The defendant is the defendant.