Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is the owner of land and obstacles in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The owners of land, persons concerned, and other persons who do not include landowners or persons concerned, but hold rights to the land to be expropriated or used or goods thereon shall deliver or transfer such land or goods to the project executor by no later than the commencement date of expropriation or use.

The Defendant deposited KRW 715,253,360 in the Seoul Western District Court on June 7, 2016, by a ruling of the Seoul Metropolitan City Land Expropriation Committee on April 22, 2016 by the Seoul Metropolitan City Local Land Expropriation Committee, the Defendant did not deliver the said land to the D District Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project Association, the project implementer, by June 10, 2016, even though the procedures for compensating for serious losses were completed under the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects, by depositing KRW 715,253,360 as compensation for losses on the land and obstacles of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, which was owned by the Defendant, with the Seoul Western District Court on June 7, 2016

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each real estate registry, a complaint and a certified copy of the corporate registry, a public notice of approval for the implementation of business, a public notice of approval for the management and disposal, a written adjudication for expropriation,

1. Article 95-2 of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor and Article 95-2 of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works Projects for the Preparation of Crimes and the Selection of Fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion regarding the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is obligated to deliver the said land to the Defendant, insofar as the said association did not establish relocation measures or pay resettlement funds under Article 78(1) of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”).