2. The judgment of the court below is unreasonable in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant had no criminal record of the same kind as the crime of this case, the defendant committed the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant was forced to commit the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant, who was in the position responsible for the chief of the C Co., Ltd., committed a large amount of payment guarantee in order to avoid personal difficulties, such as the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the circumstances and methods of the crime that forged a large amount of payment guarantee and delivered it to E, and the defendant concealed the fact that he forged a payment guarantee certificate as above, and caused the above company to face risks to pay large amounts of money. In full view of all the circumstances after the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case are not good, and other circumstances that constitute the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the judgment below is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.