2. The judgment of this case is a case where the defendant easily aided and aided the defendant to commit the crime of gambling opening at C by lending 15 million won to C three times, and the defendant does not refuse to lend money to C which was close to his usual sense and seems to have reached the crime of this case, there are some circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the crime of this case. The crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a deadly weapon, etc.), the crime of violation of the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act (a deadly weapon, etc.) and the crime of gambling aiding and abetting in this case should be considered at the same time when the crime of gambling and aiding and abetting in this case is judged, and the punishment of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc. are taken into account, and the prosecutor's above assertion is not acceptable since the court below's punishment is too uncom

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.