A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, for three years, and for one year, for defendant C, respectively.

However, Defendant C.

Defendant A and I (the indictment of non-detained to Busan District Court on October 31, 2013) are corporate trading brokers, respectively. Defendant B is the actual operator of K in Seocheon-gu J and (State) L mobile phone sales store, and Defendant C is the actual operator of N mobile phone agencies in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul.

In order to attract customers, the victim companies operated the method of providing a cell phone device as a part of the mobile phone terminal on the premise that they use the cell phone for more than three months, and at the same time paying a sales incentive (one-time subsidy) to the opening agency or sales store.

Accordingly, the Defendants opened a new mobile phone in the name of a non-profit corporation that has no intention to pay the intention to use or use the fee, etc. for more than three months, and conspired to use the new mobile phone by receiving the mobile phone ender and the subsidy.

1. Defendant A, on March 13, 2013, committed the joint crime against the victim SKT, shall deliver to the above I the documents secured by the influenite 316-2, the documents, such as the business registration certificate, corporate seal impression, corporate registration certificate, corporate representative identification card, corporate representative identification card, and corporate representative identification card, etc. A sent to the above I the documents necessary for the opening of the cell phone. The above I, as mentioned above, purchased the documents related to the corporation as seen above, after deducting the cell chip from the Defendant’s cell chip. The Defendant B sent the documents related to the corporation as seen above to the Defendant C and then sold them, after deducting the cell chip from the core chip, the chip was deducted from the cell chip opened from the Defendant C, and the Defendant C opened the cell chip to the victim SK by making an inquiry into the victim’s mobile phone through the computer.

However, in fact, the defendants open a cell phone and open it only for three months and immediately terminate it.