집행문부여
1. All appeals filed by the Defendants against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties are dismissed.
2. The appeal costs.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part pertaining to 4. conclusion), except where the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is amended as follows 2 and the judgment is added as follows 3, and thus, it is acceptable as it is
2.The amended portion of the four-dimensional boxes shall be added below:
G. Meanwhile, on August 30, 2019, the Defendants filed an application for an order to file a lawsuit regarding the instant provisional disposition with Gangwon District Court Branch. On the other hand, the said court filed an application with the Plaintiffs for the order to revoke the instant provisional disposition on the grounds of the lapse of 14 days from the date on which the order was served, and submitted documents evidencing the continuation of the lawsuit, or issued documents evidencing the continuation of the lawsuit. The Plaintiffs did not submit an order to file a lawsuit with the said court on September 6, 2019 and September 111, 2019, stating that “The instant provisional disposition was revoked on the grounds of the lapse of 14 days from the date on which the order was served.” On September 25, 2019, the Defendants filed an application with the said court for revocation of the instant provisional disposition on the grounds of the lapse of 14 days from the filing period of the lawsuit, and the said court decided to revoke the instant provisional disposition on November 6, 2019 (the instant provisional order became final and conclusive on October 16, 16, 19.
5 Under the 5th page, the phrase “is left alone until the present,” shall be amended to read as “not later than June 5, 2019.”
7 The 4th following shall be modified as follows:
was sent.
On September 29, 2016, the Plaintiffs re-enter the Defendants into the present road on September 29, 2016, if they are installed adjacent to the instant passage.