beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.11.19 2015고단1855

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business at the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam Branch for the crime of interference with business in October, 2014 and is currently under suspension of execution.

1. From around 20:00 on August 5, 2015 to 20:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) went to the “E” operated by the Plaintiff D, the Young-gu Seoul East-gu Seoul East-gu Seoul East-gu, and received a demand from the victim for drinking alcohol over several occasions; (b) whether the Defendant “I am this dog, am short, and NA amba,” and “I am amba,” and “I amba, I amba, amba, I amba, amba,” and the Defendant interfered with the Plaintiff’s safe-point business by force, by having the customers coming outside of the said bitba, and not enter the said bita, and by having the customers entering the said bitae.

2. 피고인은 2015. 8. 13. 13:40경부터 같은 날 14:10경까지 위 제1의 가항 기재 장소에서 별다른 이유 없이 피해자 D에게 “야 이 개새끼야, 좆같은 새끼야, 내가 왔는데 뭐”라는 취지로 욕설을 하고, 상의를 벗어서 가슴을 노출시킨 상태로 바닥에 주저앉고, 이에 피해자로부터 수회에 걸쳐 나가달라는 요구를 받자, “왜 내가 나가야 하는데 씨발놈아, 내가 뭘 씨발놈아, 야 이 개새끼야, 어쩌겠다고 씨발놈아”라는 취지로 욕설을 하는 등 소란을 피워 위 안경점 안에 있던 손님들로 하여금 밖으로 나가게 하고 위 안경점으로 들어오려던 손님들이 들어오지 못하게 함으로써 위력으로 위 피해자의 안경점 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each investigation report (with regard to the circumstances of damage, on-site conditions)

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of investigative reports (finite records, written judgments), and criminal records-related statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the selection of punishment;