However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who operates a travel agency with the trade name of "C" in Busan Southern-gu B.

1. The Defendant shall send a trip to the victims, including the victims E representing the club in a place where it is impossible to identify the victims who were members of the Mountain club from January 2017, at the time of continuing the gathering of friendship with the victims who are members of the Mountain club 'D'. On April 2019, the Defendant shall send a trip to the victims, including the victims E who represent the club in Busan.

The purpose of this article was to “bolding expenses for travel.”

However, in fact, the defendant had no intention or ability to normally travel, even if he received money from the victims, since he had operated the travel agent in a way to prevent the so-called return of 200 million won due to the aggravation of the management situation of the above travel agent, and even if he received money from the victims, he did not intend to normally proceed with the travel.

As a result, the Defendant received KRW 13,410,90 from the victims on May 30, 2019, including the remittance of KRW 13,410,90 from the victims, and received KRW 23,042,90 from the victims from October 4, 2019 to the victims from the time of the previous crime list (1).

2. The criminal defendant who acquired money related to the travel of the red bean by telephone to the victim F at a place where the victim F cannot be identified on January 2019 when he/she continued to have a friendly relationship between the victims including the victim F, etc. and the group traveling abroad for about 10 years prior to the mediation of the overseas travel.

The purpose was to say that the travel expenses are to be collected from the people who will make a trip.

However, as provided in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to proceed with the red-sea tour normally even if he/she received money from the victims even if he/she used it as another customer travel expense or was willing to repay the existing debt, even if he/she received money from the victims.

Ultimately, the Defendant.