If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 14:00 on June 21, 2016, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the violation of the Road Traffic Act of the above court 2016 high-level 294B in the Suwon District Court No. 301, Jun. 21, 2016.

The defendant was asked by his defense counsel B that "I am satise before her satisfy and her fysat during this time, the defendant continued to satisfy, before her fysat, and before her fysat, I am satfy," and "I am satfy, I am satfy, and I am sat. I am sat. I am satfy, and I am satfy? I am satfy, I do not have any satfy," and I am asked from the prosecutor that "I am sat, I am sat, I am satfy, I am sat at this time, I am now before our defendant next. I am satfy," and "I am asked from the prosecutor that I am sather satfy."

However, in fact, around 14:40 on October 15, 2015, the victim C attempted to stick in the front of the car of B, and the occurrence of the accident occurred later, and there was a shock to the extent that B could be aware that the accident occurred due to the accident.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of examination of the witness against the defendant and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicle photographs;

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 152 (1) of the same Act;

1. Mitigation of self-denunciations under Articles 153 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which have no criminal record against the accused, the background of perjury, etc.;