On July 7, 2017, the Defendant requested the victim C to lend KRW 10,00 to the victim at the taxi's expense at the convenience store located in Seocheon-si B around 06:30 on July 7, 2017, but the victim refused to lend KRW 10,00 to the victim at the taxi's expense, but the victim refused to do so.

The victim's convenience store business operation was obstructed by force, such as: (a) taking a bath for 40 minutes; (b) raising plastic sludge in the above convenience store; and (c) preventing other customers from entering the convenience store by avoiding the disturbance for about 40 minutes; and (d) preventing them from entering the convenience store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the investigation report (to attach CCTV images to convenience stores), investigation report (to verify CCTV inside convenience stores), and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. In light of the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act on the selection of punishment, the grounds for sentencing of punishment [the scope of recommended punishment] [the grounds for sentencing of punishment ] [the grounds for sentencing of imprisonment ] No person who does not have any special sentencing ] [the decision of sentencing ] acknowledges and reflects the defendant's wrongness (the decision of sentencing ], while the nature of the crime in this case is not good, the fact that the crime in this case is not agreed with the victim, the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same crime, and the fact that there are several records of punishment for the same crime, such as assault, etc., the defendant's age, sex behavior, means of crime, degree of interference with business, and the fact that the appellate court of Incheon District Court is under criminal trials for the same kind of crime at the appellate court as the order as ordered.