A. A. On August 16, 2016, Plaintiff A: (a) was crossing the Defendant’s vehicle at the time of entering the said intersection or temporarily stop the said intersection without entering the said intersection, on or around August 20, 2016; (b) A around that time, driven an Ichip vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) along the direction of the J-Myeon Office with one-lane of the two lanes in the direction of the J-Myeon Office, while driving the Ichip vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and driving the Ichip vehicle in the direction of the J-Myeon Office (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”); (c) A was installed on the left side of the moving direction of the Defendant vehicle, such as the said accident site map; (d) even if road construction is in progress and the front line of the said intersection was narrow, it is argued to the effect that the Defendant was driving the Defendant’s vehicle at the time when entering the said intersection, but it can be assumed that there was a conflict between the Defendant’s location at the time of collision and the point at the time of collision.

Rather, according to the evidence No. 9-26, it is recognized that the driver H of the Defendant’s vehicle driven at a speed of 70km per hour, and stated that the driver was not temporarily stopped or carried out before entering the intersection. Therefore, it is reasonable to view that the speed of 71 to 80km per hour as stated in the actual survey report No. 9-1 as the driving speed of the Defendant vehicle is the driving speed of the Defendant vehicle.

The plaintiff A's bicycle was shocked in front of the left side of the defendant's vehicle by failing to perform his duty of Jeonju as soon as he neglected to do so.

(2) On August 16, 2016, the Plaintiff A was hospitalized on August 16, 2016, and was hospitalized on August 30, 2016. The Plaintiff A was hospitalized on August 30, 2016, and was hospitalized on August 30, 2016.