However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 11:10 on January 19, 2020, the Defendant drinked drinking together with the Defendant’s house located in Ansan-si B (manam and 56 years of age), and the Defendant used the kitchen knife (the total length: 31cm, 19cm: 19cc in length: 19cc in length) which is a dangerous object in which the victim flifeed the Defendant’s side glass and flifeed the Defendant’s side glass, and used the kitchen knife (the knife: 31cm in length: 19cc in length) at the Defendant’s house located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si B, Ansan-si, and had the victim undergo approximately two weeks’s treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Investigation reports (related to the degree of damage to victims C and the number of days of treatment), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a gene appraisal report;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. A punishment like the order shall be determined by taking into consideration favorable circumstances, such as: (a) a dangerous crime using a deadly weapon with reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act; (b) a serious degree of injury is not significant; and (c) a victim does not want punishment against the defendant by mutual consent with the victim; (d) a somewhat contingent crime appears to be a somewhat contingent crime; and (e)