On January 9, 2014, at around 05:20 minutes, the Defendant driven the road in front of 100-19, Gangnam-gu, Seoul Cheonggu, Seoul, in the long distance protection area of the Hanyang apartment, and changed the course to three lanes. In such cases, the Defendant confirmed that he was well able to take the front side and left side of the course and the left side of the course, and that he was negligent in neglecting the duty of full-time care to prevent accidents, even though he was negligent in neglecting the duty of full-time care to prevent accidents.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence that caused serious injury to the victim, such as blood under the part of the external trauma, blood under the part of the external trauma, e.g., under the part of the injury requiring observation of the future one year period, e.g., e., e., sexual brain ties, and e., the right neck.

2. The facts charged in this case are governed by Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. In such a case, a public prosecution may not be instituted against the express will of the victim under paragraph (2) of the same Article.

However, on July 2, 2014, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished by the Defendant on July 2, 2014, and thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.