A. The Defendant did not insult the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below.

B. The lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable because of its excessive sentencing.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, in particular, according to the statements in the investigation agency of C, E, D, F, and G and the court of the court below, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that he insultd the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

B. It is difficult to see that the defendant is against his wrongness, and there is no special change in circumstances that determine the punishment differently from the original judgment in the trial.

In addition, in full view of the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health status, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit