On February 7, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor at Suwon District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 27, 2014.

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) in a Buddhist place in Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul”); and (b) in fact, the Defendant, despite being supplied goods from the victim C, did not have the intent or ability to pay the money properly; and (c) made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would send a 180 box to the Galds Dolet 180,000,000 won by sending the phone to the Defendant; and (d) received a 180 box from the victim, which was acquired from the victim, for the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written petition;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigation reports by prosecutors (Evidence Nos. 7) and Acts and subordinate statutes to final and conclusive certification personnel;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the latter part of Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment (it refers to all circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant acknowledges his mistake, the scale of damage caused by the crime of this case, and equity in the case that a judgment has been rendered simultaneously with a final and conclusive fraud, such as the previous conviction