When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2013. 10. 23. 14:12경 제주시 조천읍 교래리에 있는 산굼부리 앞 도로상을 C 쏘나타 차량을 운전하여 교래리 쪽에서 대천동사거리 쪽으로 직진하게 되었다.

Since the place is where a central line is installed, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate and safely drive steering the steering direction and brakes while living well on the front side and the left side, and to prevent accidents by safely driving without harming the central line.

Nevertheless, there was a conflict between victim D(61 years of age, south) who was running in the middle line due to a stroke driver's negligence, and the front part of the Estyna vehicle driven by the victim D(61 years of age, south).

In the end, the defendant's negligence inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a chest spawn, spawn, chest spawn, etc., and suffered from the injury of the damaged vehicle F (53 years of age, women) such as spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn, and so on, the injured vehicle G (56 years of age, women) of the damaged vehicle with approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual survey report and related photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.