2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Network J and the Network K will be the deceased L on March 24, 1983.

Plaintiff

A is the spouse of the network K, and the children of plaintiffs B, C, D, and E are children of the network K, and the network K died on June 28, 2010.

Defendant F and G are the children of the networkJ, Defendant H is the children of Defendant G, and the networkJ died on November 19, 1985.

B. On December 22, 1961, the registration of ownership preservation was completed in M. M. On the same day, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on December 19, 1961, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on May 26, 1986 on the grounds of the deceased J’s spouse net N. and Defendant F’s inheritance by agreement division on November 19, 1985.

On December 2, 2014, the transfer registration of ownership was completed on May 11, 2014 on the portion of 1/2 of the land in this case of the network N due to the inheritance due to the consultation division.

On March 5, 2015, Defendant F and G’s share of 1/2 of each of the instant land was completed on February 17, 2015 due to the gift on March 5, 2015.

C. The building ledger for the first floor of the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”) is registered as the owner by the network K.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, Eul evidence No. 1, gist of the plaintiffs' assertion as to the purport of the whole pleadings

A. The deceased L purchased the instant land and the instant building from M from around 1950 to around 1961, and donated it to the deceased K.

The Network K occupied the instant land and the instant building with the intention of ownership from November 19, 1985 to July 14, 2010, when the deceased of the GJ, from November 19, 1985, the deceased of the GJ occupied the instant land and the instant building, and thereafter the Plaintiffs inherited the instant land and the instant building.

Therefore, on November 19, 2005, the network K completed the prescriptive acquisition of the instant land, and the Plaintiffs claim the ownership transfer registration of the instant land following the completion of the prescriptive acquisition by the network K.