beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.01.18 2016가합206363

매매대금

Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 207,964,580 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from September 10, 2016 to January 18, 2019.

Reasons

The main lawsuit and counterclaim are also examined.

1. Basic facts

A. Since around 2015, the Plaintiff was designated as a site for an urban planning project, and had not been implemented yet, planned the construction of a new construction of a main complex building (hereinafter “instant project”) after cancelling the designation of a site for an automobile depots and other relevant land (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On June 26, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a building design contract (hereinafter “instant design contract”) for the instant project.

The main contents of the instant design contract are as follows.

(2) The contract area of a contract (20,907 square meters): The contract area of 68,91.8 square meters (20,907 square meters): the contract area of 68,991.8 square meters (20,907 square meters): The contract area of 2,094,000,000 won (excluding value-added tax): the Plaintiff designer: (1) the contract area of 20.90 square meters (the contract area and the period): 20.907 square meters (the total design area prepared by the Defendant): 10.00,000 won (the scope of contracts, etc.): < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 13588, Jul. 1, 2015; Presidential Decree No. 17500, Feb. 1, 2015; Presidential Decree No. 17094, Oct. 4, 2000; Presidential Decree No. 17200, Oct. 4, 2005>