난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited this case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, thereby citing this case as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article
[Additional Decision] The Plaintiff asserts that “In light of the case of murder of the Plaintiff’s external village in the trial, the Plaintiff is faced with a clear situation that the Plaintiff would be killed from the PI, Punja Podon (PI), so the Plaintiff has a well-founded fear of persecution in Pakistan, a nationality country. However, in full view of the evidence adopted by the first instance court as seen earlier, the Plaintiff’s legal system and public security status of Pakistan acknowledged by the evidence, the specific contents and nature of the Plaintiff’s gambling, the Plaintiff’s entry route, the period to which the Plaintiff’s request for refugee status was made, and the details of the request for refugee status, etc., it does not seem that there is no sufficient evidence to deem that the Plaintiff might be subject to political or social gambling. Even if the Plaintiff’s external village was killed, it is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff’s allegation that the Plaintiff was unable to receive the Plaintiff’s personal information from the police station at the time of the Plaintiff’s report and that there was no fear that the Plaintiff did not receive any money and valuables from the Defendant at the time of 131.”
2. Conclusion.