The defendant is a person with no military service who is subject to a call-up for military force mobilization training.

On October 23, 2017, the Defendant did not enter the military forces mobilization training in the name of the head of the Seoul Central Military Affairs Administration on the designated date and time without justifiable grounds, even though he received a notice of call for military forces mobilization training under the name of the head of the Seoul Central Military Affairs Administration, which was issued by the head of the Seoul Central Military Affairs Administration, to undergo the military forces mobilization training conducted from November 28, 2017 to November 30 of the same year (2 Park 3th, 2017 to November 30 of the same year).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning delivery status to training notice;

1. Article 90 of the relevant Act on criminal facts, Article 90 of the Military Service Act on the Selection of Punishment, and Selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (Consideration of the fact that the defendant is recognized as a substitute for the crime and reflects the fact that the defendant is an initial offender, and that he seems to have completed all subsequent training after the instant case);