beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.29 2017가합510770

손해배상(지)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff, under the trade name of “C”, has an office located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and 223, and sells and sells charging structure equipment, etc. from around 2010. 2) The Defendant, under the trade name of “E”, sells and sells various structural equipment with an office located in “E” in the Gyeonggi-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

B. The Plaintiff’s promotional activity 1) In April 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) at the “International Fire Safety EXPO”; and (b) at the “International Fire Safety EXPO”; and (c) the Plaintiff’s ordered and manufactured by requesting it to Germany’s (Featum HS-119)” (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s product”).

(2) In addition to the first introduction of the Plaintiff’s product, the Plaintiff participated in the International Fire Safety Exhibitions in 2015 and 2016, and introduced the Plaintiff’s product. (2) around November 2015, the Plaintiff promoted the Plaintiff’s product in Daegu and Jeju, such as the “Purchase Counseling Council for the Purchase of City/Do Fire-Fighting Equipment” opened in Daegu and Jeju, and the “First Korean Safety Industry Exhibitions” opened in Goyang-si around November 2015.

3) The Plaintiff sells the Plaintiff’s product in the Internet shopping mall, chi-market, chi-development range, and G. (4) The Plaintiff offered a proposal to establish a regional agency from the Defendant on March 2016 and discussed the joint business with the Defendant, and then sent the specifications and estimates of the Plaintiff’s product to the Defendant upon the Defendant’s request.

C. 1) The Jeju Fire Safety Headquarters’s bid for the structure and equipment of the Jeju Fire Safety Headquarters is a public announcement of tender announcement regarding “119 rescue equipment (general, protection, and destruction)” around 2016 (Public Notice No. H, I, and hereinafter “instant tender announcement”).

[2] Around August 2016, the case does not hold that the Jeju Fire Safety Headquarters directly purchased structures and equipment from the Defendant from January 1, 2015 to June 2017, 201, by selecting Nonparty L, which is a business entity in K and 402 in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, as a supplier, and purchasing class 339,000,000 of structural equipment, such as oxygen absorption equipment.

[Ground of recognition] There is no dispute, and there are evidence Nos. 1 through 20.