However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

B. At around 20:50 on July 2, 2013, C jointly took place, on the street in front of the area of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and on the ground that C, upon receiving 112 report, she prevented a police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station E-gu, Suwon-si, who is a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station E-gu, and the elderly, who is dissatisfied with each other while taking a desire, C took a view of “F's clothes,” and took a view of “the spacife, spacifes, and spacifes,” and carried the chest part several times, and the other spacife, “the Defendant is subject to spacife, spacife, assault, assault, spacife, spacife, and spacife,” and the spacife of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the son.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol (including statements stated in F and G) of the accused and C;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, photographs, and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is that the defendant denies and does not reflect the crime, and the risk of obstruction of performance of official duties and the possibility of social criticism is considered, a serious punishment is required against the defendant. However, the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind, the criminal situation is relatively heavy, and the motive, means and result of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and the family environment of this case are determined by comprehensively taking account of all the sentencing conditions as the order.