2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant's mistake was recognized by his mistake, the occurrence of a traffic accident did not occur at the time of the crime; and (b) the defendant's driving distance of a vehicle in a drinking state does not long; (c) the defendant has been punished five times or more as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act; (d) the defendant was released from prison under sentence due to a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) around September 201; (e) the defendant again committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime; (e) the defendant's blood alcohol concentration was very high at the time of the crime; and (e) the defendant's blood alcohol concentration was extremely high at the time of the crime; and (e) the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, the circumstances after the crime, etc., are too unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.