If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. The Defendant, by telephone on September 4, 2014, would be liable for the settlement at a discount of an electronic bill upon request by D on November 20, 2014 at a discount of 200 million won on the payment date of KRW 200 million for the issuance of strong energy.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

D On September 5, 2014, the victim requested the discount of the electronic bill to the victim at the G office of F management of the victim E located in Ma.

However, on August 2014, the Defendant received the request from the I to the holder of the bill at issue.

On September 4, 2014, upon receipt of a request for a discount of a bill, the bill was served with the account under the name of the J (State) operated by the Defendant, but the Defendant was aware of the fact that there was no intention or ability to settle the bill on the payment date by the issuer (State) and that there was no special property under the name of the Defendant at that time, and there was no special income, but there was no special income, but there was a need to pay about KRW 15 million every month with daily living expenses, office operating expenses, etc., and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the bill on the payment date, considering the financial status of the Defendant, such as national tax and the payment of approximately KRW 677,769,90,000.

Nevertheless, on September 6, 2014, the Defendant received 48 million won from the injured party to the account under the J (State).

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant was found to have committed a crime on November 26, 2014 on the charge of the charge on December 6, 2014. However, this appears to have been written on the basis of the date indicated in the victim’s accusation. According to the details of banking transactions and the contents of examination of witness, it is confirmed that the date of crime was November 26, 2014.

However, the defendant's argument is not a date but a crime of fraud, and the date difference.