산지관리법위반등
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the defendant guilty of the violation of the farmland law among the facts charged in this case. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of free conviction due to violating the logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the subject of permission to convert mountainous districts under the Mountainous Districts Management Act, changing the form and quality of land under the Act on National Land Planning and Utilization Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the subject of permission to occupy and use urban parks and green areas, the subject of permission to occupy and use urban parks
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.