If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On May 2016, the Defendant: (a) around May 2016, at an officetel where female-friendly job offering victim D is living in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, caused a vision among the victims and the dispute with the victim; and (b) made a hole in which the city’s aesthetic toilet was in drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed another person’s property and harmed its utility as above.

2. On June 5, 2016, at around 03:30 on June 5, 2016, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “singly blick blick blick blick blicked with a blick blick.” On the same place, the Defendant left smartphone 7 of an amount equivalent to 9.60,000 won at the market price on the floor for a gallon and damaged the internal traffic.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed another person’s property and harmed its utility as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Application of each statement, each photographic statute;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 366 of the choice of punishment, and the choice of a fine (including the fact that the crime is committed during the period of repeated crime, but the damage is relatively minor, the agreement with the victim is reached, and the crime is too late);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;