A. On May 12, 2018, D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) around 12:50 on May 12, 2018

(B) the E bus owned by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”);

) The Plaintiff, a passenger of the Defendant vehicle, was stopped at the bus stops located in 118, as decided in the city of 10,000, and the part of the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered from the 12 plecarcity emissions.

3) Defendant B’s Federation (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”).

(4) On the other hand, the inside of the Defendant’s vehicle was milched at the time of the instant accident.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, 4, 7, 12, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, or the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The plaintiff of the 1st party's assertion as to the recognition of liability is that the defendant C is a person who operates the defendant vehicle, and the defendant federation is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement for the defendant vehicle, and the defendants are jointly responsible for compensating the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to

As to this, the Defendants asserted that the instant accident does not occur due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, and that the lower stairs of the Defendant’s vehicle are installed with the antidrums and the antidrums, and that the stairs are installed with sufficient measures to prevent the spreading of rainwater, such as the hole of rainwater drainage, but the instant accident occurred due to the Plaintiff’s prior mistake, and thus, the Defendant should be exempted from liability.

The plaintiff is a trucking business operator who entered into a contract of carriage with the plaintiff who is a passenger of the defendant C, and is an incidental duty under the contract of carriage.