양수금
1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff’s Intervenor KRW 43,433,424 and KRW 30,000,000 among them. < Amended by Act No. 1320, Jan. 9, 2015>
1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor
(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;
(b) Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);
2. While the Plaintiff’s claim was pending in the lawsuit of this case, the Plaintiff transferred to the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor the claim as stated in the separate sheet against the Defendants. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.
(Plaintiffs filed an application for withdrawal from a lawsuit on December 10, 2014, but their withdrawal has no effect without the Defendant’s consent).