However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who operates B-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-C-W-C.

On October 16, 2016, the Defendant was driving ahead of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel.

At the same time, the driver was a road with the center line of yellow-ray, so there was a duty of care to safely proceed with the tea while thoroughly maintaining the front-round city.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence of driving a vehicle with the center line of the above road caused the victim C(64) driver’s cherb to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle for approximately 8 weeks, and caused the victim to undergo approximately 4 weeks of treatment to the victim E (64 years old) who was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment, and to take approximately 6 weeks of treatment to the victim E (68 years old) who was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment, and to the victim F (68 years old) who was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment, and to the victim G(75 years old) who was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in need of approximately 6 weeks of hair treatment, and to the victim G(65 years old) who was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of F, H, G, C, and E;

1. A traffic accident report and a traffic accident report (on-site investigation report);

1. A report on investigation (Attachment of on-site photographs);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrence and the choice of a sentence (the punishment and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor prescribed for the crime against the victim H in the holding that each crime is the most severe among the crimes in the judgment, and the punishment and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor);

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: